2026 Men's Wimbledon Championships

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
55,386
Reactions
34,761
Points
113
Two more sets.. Wu is playing very aggressively
He has always had good potential AP injuries has stalled his career so far surgeries on his left foot, lower back, shoulder and elbow and I am not making these injuries or surgeries up
 
Last edited:

PhiEaglesfan712

Major Winner
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,747
Reactions
1,464
Points
113
At least I know when it's over. If Djokovic doesn't win the 3rd and 4th sets, then it's probably over.

I knew Federer was done when Mannarino took him to 5 sets in the first round. The fact that he even made it to the quarterfinals that year was a miracle.
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,324
Reactions
7,466
Points
113
Good post brother, but whatever way we look at it, Carlos had 7 slams including a career slam at the age Sinner won his first. Sinner is benefiting from Carlos development, and from the tour being in transition. I think and hope you’re right that there’ll be a third wheel someday soon, but not in the way that Djokovic waited until the other pair had punched themselves into middle age, before he finally turned up to benefit from that…
I'm starting to get the sense that you don't like Novak ;). But to be fair to the Serb, his explosion in 2011 was in the heart of Rafa's prime years. I've pointed out countless times that Rafa's 2011 results are EXACTLY the same as 2010, if you take Novak out of the picture. He was just as dominant against everyone else, but he just couldn't beat the gluten-free Novak. At least that year. They were pretty close overall after.

And yes, Carlos has been a great young player - the best since Rafa, and one of the four or five best of the Open Era. But that doesn't mean he'll have a better career than Sinner, who has followed more of a Roger-esque career trajectory. I remember posting about it in 2023 and feeling hesitant to do so, because there was no knowing how good Sinner would become, but through 2023, his overall career trajectory and ELO very closely mirrored Roger through 2003 at the same age.

Meaning, Carlos was definitely better than Jannik through their 22nd birthdays, but that doesn't mean he'll be better from 22 on. We shall see. This year has brought up moderate concerns for both, I think. I wouldn't be surprised if ten years from now, we look back at 2024-25 as the peak of their shared dominance, with 2026-27 still dominant, but less so, and 2028 and on more balanced with other young players entering their primes (e.g. Fonseca, Jodar, maybe Mensik, eventually Kouame, etc).
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,324
Reactions
7,466
Points
113
I just saw Novak lost the 2nd set. I was still recovering from Japan's loss to Brazil. That was a tight game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
55,386
Reactions
34,761
Points
113
I'm starting to get the sense that you don't like Novak ;). But to be fair to the Serb, his explosion in 2011 was in the heart of Rafa's prime years. I've pointed out countless times that Rafa's 2011 results are EXACTLY the same as 2010, if you take Novak out of the picture. He was just as dominant against everyone else, but he just couldn't beat the gluten-free Novak. At least that year. They were pretty close overall after.

And yes, Carlos has been a great young player - the best since Rafa, and one of the four or five best of the Open Era. But that doesn't mean he'll have a better career than Sinner, who has followed more of a Roger-esque career trajectory. I remember posting about it in 2023 and feeling hesitant to do so, because there was no knowing how good Sinner would become, but through 2023, his overall career trajectory and ELO very closely mirrored Roger through 2003 at the same age.

Meaning, Carlos was definitely better than Jannik through their 22nd birthdays, but that doesn't mean he'll be better from 22 on. We shall see. This year has brought up moderate concerns for both, I think. I wouldn't be surprised if ten years from now, we look back at 2024-25 as the peak of their shared dominance, with 2026-27 still dominant, but less so, and 2028 and on more balanced with other young players entering their primes (e.g. Fonseca, Jodar, maybe Mensik, eventually Kouame, etc).
My main concern for Carlos is his wrist? I just hope it wont be chronic, I watched a small video of him in practice, hitting gently with his wrist, lets see when he does come back to the tour, he is projected to come back HC's and in time for the USO
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,324
Reactions
7,466
Points
113
My main concern for Carlos is his wrist? I just hope it wont be chronic, I watched a small video of him in practice, hitting gently with his wrist, lets see when he does come back to the tour, he is projected to come back HC's and in time for the USO
Yeah, I'm calling it (and Jannik's mystery issue) "moderate" because you've got to give such great athletes the benefit of the doubt that they'll recover/adjust, but wrist injuries are no joke.

I'd really like to see the Sincaraz hegemony broken up by more than a Zverev vulture, but not at the expense of either of them not being able to return to peak form. I would like to see if Carlos is capable of putting together a crazy year in which he is able to maintain his best form all season. He really could win all four, or at least do a 3-Slam season. And I'd love to see Jannik complete the calendar Slam to go with his remarkable feat of winning all nine Masters. I do think both will get to double-digit Slams.

The tennis nerd in me kind of likes the idea of Jannik not winning any Slams this year, but somehow winning all nine Masters. Very unlikely, but it would be such a weird and fun historical anomaly.

Anyhow, if Jannik has worked out the rust and can handle the heat, Wimbledon is his to lose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
18,528
Reactions
8,457
Points
113
I'm starting to get the sense that you don't like Novak ;). But to be fair to the Serb, his explosion in 2011 was in the heart of Rafa's prime years. I've pointed out countless times that Rafa's 2011 results are EXACTLY the same as 2010, if you take Novak out of the picture. He was just as dominant against everyone else, but he just couldn't beat the gluten-free Novak. At least that year. They were pretty close overall after.

And yes, Carlos has been a great young player - the best since Rafa, and one of the four or five best of the Open Era. But that doesn't mean he'll have a better career than Sinner, who has followed more of a Roger-esque career trajectory. I remember posting about it in 2023 and feeling hesitant to do so, because there was no knowing how good Sinner would become, but through 2023, his overall career trajectory and ELO very closely mirrored Roger through 2003 at the same age.

Meaning, Carlos was definitely better than Jannik through their 22nd birthdays, but that doesn't mean he'll be better from 22 on. We shall see. This year has brought up moderate concerns for both, I think. I wouldn't be surprised if ten years from now, we look back at 2024-25 as the peak of their shared dominance, with 2026-27 still dominant, but less so, and 2028 and on more balanced with other young players entering their primes (e.g. Fonseca, Jodar, maybe Mensik, eventually Kouame, etc).
Rafa had had six years of being Roger’s only competition, while he was still in growth and development, and even the season before this, he beat Roger, when aged only 17. He wasn’t growing peacefully in the shade, like Novak.

With Sinner, I think in those old fashioned days of the Big 3, he’d be Andy Murray. I actually am getting convinced by Fonseca, he works hard and hates losing, the two ingredients Novak discovered eventually, in late-2010. There’s a lot to be said for it. I have an inbuilt resistance to players benefiting from Spanish players injuries, so a run by Fonzie to a big title would be great for the sport. It’s not a great World Cup but even at that, Wimbledon won’t make a dent in it without great players doing great things, even if they’re still teenagers…
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
18,528
Reactions
8,457
Points
113
I blame Jannik for 5 sets, I guess they need to shut the roof for darkness coming dont want the old boy squinting do we? he does wear contact lenses :)
The dumb bastard is struggling in the first round, when he really needs an easy first week…

:popcorn
 

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
55,386
Reactions
34,761
Points
113
Yeah, I'm calling it (and Jannik's mystery issue) "moderate" because you've got to give such great athletes the benefit of the doubt that they'll recover/adjust, but wrist injuries are no joke.

I'd really like to see the Sincaraz hegemony broken up by more than a Zverev vulture, but not at the expense of either of them not being able to return to peak form. I would like to see if Carlos is capable of putting together a crazy year in which he is able to maintain his best form all season. He really could win all four, or at least do a 3-Slam season. And I'd love to see Jannik complete the calendar Slam to go with his remarkable feat of winning all nine Masters. I do think both will get to double-digit Slams.

The tennis nerd in me kind of likes the idea of Jannik not winning any Slams this year, but somehow winning all nine Masters. Very unlikely, but it would be such a weird and fun historical anomaly.

Anyhow, if Jannik has worked out the rust and can handle the heat, Wimbledon is his to lose.
I would rather Jannik win a GS this year and take your point winning all 9 Masters, he can shelve that this year just saying:)
 

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
55,386
Reactions
34,761
Points
113
The dumb bastard is struggling in the first round, when he really needs an easy first week…

:popcorn
Tell me about it lol , I also want to know how he got a nail in his shoe with blood coming from his white shoe, he did have a bad fall on the grass, I Hate the grass in the first week at Wimbledon
To me he should have played Halle like last year to get some matches on the grass
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,324
Reactions
7,466
Points
113
Rafa had had six years of being Roger’s only competition, while he was still in growth and development, and even the season before this, he beat Roger, when aged only 17. He wasn’t growing peacefully in the shade, like Novak.

With Sinner, I think in those old fashioned days of the Big 3, he’d be Andy Murray. I actually am getting convinced by Fonseca, he works hard and hates losing, the two ingredients Novak discovered eventually, in late-2010. There’s a lot to be said for it. I have an inbuilt resistance to players benefiting from Spanish players injuries, so a run by Fonzie to a big title would be great for the sport. It’s not a great World Cup but even at that, Wimbledon won’t make a dent in it without great players doing great things, even if they’re still teenagers…
I think you're underselling Jannik a bit, though I also see Andy as an ATG who had unfortunate career timing. In the 90s, he would have been right there with Agassi and just behind Pete, imo. Jannik actually reminds me a bit of Lendl, who I think is the most underrated ATG of the Open Era. I rank Lendl ahead of Connors and Agassi, and right there will Borg and Mac...and just a bit behind Pete. Sinner has a similar "terminator" quality, and is probably a bit more dynamic with his Novak-esque gumbyism.

LOL at "growing peacefully in the shade." I didn't like Novak much back in the day, especially during the shirt-ripping days. But I also felt for him being chronically third fiddle and respected the player he became. I think in the end, the Big Three were similarly great at their respective bests; Fedal have a nice complementary quality of different types of GOATness that will forever make them overall equals in my mind, but in the end Novak was able to take advantage of his opportunities to compile the best career. so for me, the GOAT is a triangle with Novak at the top, and Fedal the two "wing points."
 

PhiEaglesfan712

Major Winner
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,747
Reactions
1,464
Points
113
I'm starting to get the sense that you don't like Novak ;). But to be fair to the Serb, his explosion in 2011 was in the heart of Rafa's prime years. I've pointed out countless times that Rafa's 2011 results are EXACTLY the same as 2010, if you take Novak out of the picture. He was just as dominant against everyone else, but he just couldn't beat the gluten-free Novak. At least that year. They were pretty close overall after.
The more I think of it, 2010 is Rafa's absolute best year ever. That was the year he was untouchable on all surfaces. Novak aside, Rafa being taken to 5 sets in the first round of the French Open, to a serve bot no less, starts to show the decline of Rafa in 2011.

2011 was the last real year of Rafa's peak. In 2012, Rafa had the upset loss to Rosol at Wimbledon, and he never made a Wimbledon final after that.
 

the AntiPusher

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,856
Reactions
7,676
Points
113
Rafa had had six years of being Roger’s only competition, while he was still in growth and development, and even the season before this, he beat Roger, when aged only 17. He wasn’t growing peacefully in the shade, like Novak.

With Sinner, I think in those old fashioned days of the Big 3, he’d be Andy Murray. I actually am getting convinced by Fonseca, he works hard and hates losing, the two ingredients Novak discovered eventually, in late-2010. There’s a lot to be said for it. I have an inbuilt resistance to players benefiting from Spanish players injuries, so a run by Fonzie to a big title would be great for the sport. It’s not a great World Cup but even at that, Wimbledon won’t make a dent in it without great players doing great things, even if they’re still teenagers
Novak got his mojo back
 

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
55,386
Reactions
34,761
Points
113
The more I think of it, 2010 is Rafa's absolute best year ever. That was the year he was untouchable on all surfaces. Novak aside, Rafa being taken to 5 sets in the first round of the French Open, to a serve bot no less, starts to show the decline of Rafa in 2011.

2011 was the last real year of Rafa's peak. In 2012, Rafa had the upset loss to Rosol at Wimbledon, and he never made a Wimbledon final after that.
NO WAY
Rafa's best year was 2008 he took his clay game to another level and won his first Wimbledon final completing the Channel Slam which isthe Hardest thing to achieve in our game, I was live at RG he was Unplayable.............stopped Rogers winning streak on grass at the Wimbledon 2008 final.
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,324
Reactions
7,466
Points
113
The more I think of it, 2010 is Rafa's absolute best year ever. That was the year he was untouchable on all surfaces. Novak aside, Rafa being taken to 5 sets in the first round of the French Open, to a serve bot no less, starts to show the decline of Rafa in 2011.

2011 was the last real year of Rafa's peak. In 2012, Rafa had the upset loss to Rosol at Wimbledon, and he never made a Wimbledon final after that.
I go back and forth on whether I think 2010 or 2013 was his best year, with 2008 being his clear third. There's a big drop-off from those three seasons and the rest of his career. Actually, I did a "top 50 seasons of the Open Era" project (which eventually became top 100) which I was planning on sharing eventually, if and when I become satisfied with my formula. But those three years are all in the top 15. My latest iteration had 2010 being #9, 2013 being #11, and 2008 being #15. his next cluster of seasons are all outside the top 40, though just barely so (2017, 2019, 2005 all in the 45-51 range).

In my list, Rafa actually has the most top 100 seasons: 12, followed by Novak with 11, Roger with 10. Those three account for 33% of the 100 best seasons of the Open Era (according to my formula). Kind of crazy if you think about it.

It is really too bad about Steve Darcis, because 2013 really could have been his greatest year if not for that one upset. He also didn't fade post-USO like he did in 2010, winning both Canada and Cincy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,324
Reactions
7,466
Points
113
NO WAY
Rafa's best year was 2008 he took his clay game to another level and won his first Wimbledon final completing the Channel Slam which isthe Hardest thing to achieve in our game, I was live at RG he was Unplayable.............stopped Rogers winning streak on grass at the Wimbledon 2008 final.
I can see how 2008 was the most memorable season for a Rafa fan, but I think 2010 and '13 were slightly better. Also, while the Channel Slam is still very impressive, it is not what it was back in Borg's day when the surfaces were completely different. The Big Three all played during the slow grass era. Still very difficult, of course, but not like pre-2001.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
55,386
Reactions
34,761
Points
113
I go back and forth on whether I think 2010 or 2013 was his best year, with 2008 being his clear third. There's a big drop-off from those three seasons and the rest of his career. Actually, I did a "top 50 seasons of the Open Era" project (which eventually became top 100) which I was planning on sharing eventually, if and when I become satisfied with my formula. But those three years are all in the top 15. My latest iteration had 2010 being #9, 2013 being #11, and 2008 being #15. his next cluster of seasons are all outside the top 40, though just barely so (2017, 2019, 2005 all in the 45-51 range).

In my list, Rafa actually has the most top 100 seasons: 12, followed by Novak with 11, Roger with 10. Those three account for 33% of the 100 best seasons of the Open Era (according to my formula). Kind of crazy if you think about it.

It is really too bad about Steve Darcis, because 2013 really could have been his greatest year if not for that one upset. He also didn't fade post-USO like he did in 2010, winning both Canada and Cincy.
I disagree strongly 2008 was Rafa's best, unplayable on the clay, won the Channel Slam and stopped Rogers winning streak on grass
Winning the Channel slam is the hardest thing to achieve in our game, I look for content on how people win, Rafa made the SFs at USO that year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the AntiPusher

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,324
Reactions
7,466
Points
113
I disagree strongly 2008 was Rafa's best, unplayable on the clay, won the Channel Slam and stopped Rogers winning streak on grass
Winning the Channel slam is the hardest thing to achieve in our game, I look for content on how people win, Rafa made the SFs at USO that year.
I read you the first time ;-)