^As I understand it, Californian politics is a bit broken because they've fractionalised decision making to such a degree that neither the governor, nor the legislators have the power to resolve the housing issue. So I do agree that it doesn't make sense to blame female administrators. But that doesn't invalidate the thesis. I would like to read the research the guy claims is coming out to see if there's anything in the difference between male and female decision making and whether changes need to be made. I have a feeling, if it's true, that some areas need more male attention, but I also believe that there are probably areas that need more female attention. What we have right now in a lot of places, particularly in the West are clearly not working. If it helps to fix this malaise then who would want to argue with it?
PS, it's worth noting that in my time working in investment banking there were people who liked meetings. To sit there and talk, not actually do things, just to plan. And there were others who just wanted to go ahead and get things done. I'm not saying the talkers were women only, but without fail the ones who got irritated with meetings and just wanted to be about their business tended to be men. Make of that what you will