Puppet Master said:
nehmeth said:
Roger came out playing as well as he did in his previous two matches. He just came up against someone who was playing better. Roger often had to hit three winners to get one point, and sometimes that wasn't even enough. He was forced to go for more and the ue's crept upward.
The match was not on his racquet as it used to be in days gone by. This time it was on Novak's racquet, and when he lost focus, Fed the opportunist pounced and ran as far as he could with it. Those last few games, physically and mentally, the old guy just lost the plot.
You are right, Djokovic was a lot better than anyone Fedster faced before the final, but please don't tell me he didn't have a chance just because Novak was hitting very deep baseline shots. At the very least he could have served better, and I remember he had some crazy shanks, there must have been 35+ ue, that wasn't all Novak.
I never said it was because of deep baselne shots, nor did I ever say it was all Novak. I just said that the match was on his racquet this time.
Watch the first set again. Regarding Roger's serve, he's playing the best returner in the game. Novak makes everyone go for more on their serve because of that. And things start to break down for his opponents from there.
Some of Fed's shanks were due to the heavy shots coming his way, some were due to his not getting to the ball quickly enough, some were frrustration and at the end he was just worn down.