Kieran
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 18,427
- Reactions
- 8,394
- Points
- 113
It’s one thing some people think, that Roger played pretty and won. Roger was a tough, nasty bastard. Aged almost 38 he had two championship points at Wimbledon against a player 6-7 years younger and ranked number one, and to some idiots this was proof that he’s a weak, meme-worthy loser. I remember he had match points in the 2005 Australian Open semi with Safin, and he was the subject of ignorant mockery even then, but I was thinking, jeez even on an off day this bloke is hard to kill.FAA , head scratcher game after being up 0-40 on Cobolli’s serve at 1-2, one set all, he had soo many chances early in that 3rd set & Coboli looked a little spent and was splaying the BH but Felix could not go for the kill.
I will say this one last time; can we please stop saying how well FAA played in that 5 set match with Rafa at the FO a few years ago. He plays up or down to his competition & he LOST that match.
Play ugly & win is what champs do.
FAA plays “pretty”, that does not always work.
Guys like Roger ought to be avoided if you’re on your own at night walking down a dark alley. FAA should think about these things…