I'm trying to find a reason to like Hubi, but I can't. He's just a servebot in Red shorts. Boy wouldn't know a return if it smacked him in the gonads.
Yeah he played like in the old days. Rune did well but Gregor was just to good today.Looks like Grigor didn't fold today and wins the title in straight sets.
I watched the match when it was 4 all it was close, then decided to give tennis a break for the day/nightLooks like Grigor didn't fold today and wins the title in straight sets.
Kidding aside, the first set was played at such a high level; beautiful shotmaking from both guys. Truly enjoyable to watch.Looks like Grigor didn't fold today and wins the title in straight sets.
Hold on...haven't you been the one dissing 2 of the Big 3 for the past decade? And also been asking for the Next Gen to step up? At least Shelton is a creditable tennis player.I see Aukland / ASB Classic started tonight w/ Ben Shelton the top seed! Anyone taking bets if he'll get out of the 2nd or 3rd round? He's been on my bad side acting out and disrespecting Djokovic at the USO last year! Be confident all you like, but you can't be an a-#ole when it comes to the Big 3 of the past gen.! Shap got a WC so it'll be good to see him after all this time! Wolf already upset in the 1st round thanks to Van Assche!![]()
Well, no, but Gasquet was one of the stalwarts. Think of Feliciano Lopez, or Tomas Berdych. Given that he's only 2 weeks younger than Nadal, and that they played juniors together, and were both touted early, Gasquet has always been an interesting case study in the difference between an excellent, and lucrative career, and a HOF one.Stop the presses:
![]()
Richard Gasquet's 18 years in the ATP top 100 leaves him in esteemed company | Flashscore.com
Richard Gasquet (37) has never won a Grand Slam - only three times during his long career has he reached the semi-finals of one. Yet he has become a respected tennis personality over the years. In April 2005, he entered the top 100 of the ATP rankings for the first time and has remained there...www.flashscore.com
Richard Gasquet falls out of the top 100 for the first time since 2005 - his 956 consecutive weeks behind only Federer (1165) and Nadal (1029) and ahead of Novak (945).
I guess we've had the third spoke of the Big Three wrong all this time?
You know I was joking, right?Well, no, but Gasquet was one of the stalwarts. Think of Feliciano Lopez, or Tomas Berdych. Given that he's only 2 weeks younger than Nadal, and that they played juniors together, and were both touted early, Gasquet has always been an interesting case study in the difference between an excellent, and lucrative career, and a HOF one.
Sorry, it's possible that Nadal's injury and withdrawal from the AO has shaved something off my sense of humor.You know I was joking, right?
I think he's between those two. Lopez had similar longevity, but was half a step below Gasquet. Berdych had a bit less longevity, but was a much better player.
By PEP, he's at 41. Here is every player in the Open Era with 40-49 PEP:
48 Clerc
46 Monfils, Mayotte
45 Costa, G Mayer
44 A Medvedev, Ferreira
43 Isner
42 Dimitrov, Gonzalez, Higueras
41 Gasquet, Soderling, Rusedski, Cash
40 Coria, Panatta
Three Slam winners, but all pretty much definitive "one-Slam wonders" (Cash, Panatta, Costa). Lots of what could be called "third tier" guys, or very weak "second tier" types. OF that list, only Gasquet, Gonzalez, and Monfils didn't win at least one Masters equivlaent,and Gasquet and Gonzalez only won ATP 250s, but Fernando reached a Slam final.
Lopez is all the way down at 22 PEP, Berdych way up at 86.