DarthFed said:Obsi said:DarthFed said:Everyone's definition is different. He will likely retire well before that happens. Dropping out of the top 10 means he is either injured for most of a year or 40 years old. Comparing someone who used to win 95% of their matches and get to every single GS semi and nearly every final to the Roger of today is serious decline. The guy is that talented that even as a fraction of himself he is still one of the best as he approaches 35. Respect the talent or let the hate consume you![]()
You overestimate Federer. Saying he is in serious decline despite being No. 3 is just laughable...
Number 3 behind Murray... Not an overestimation of a serious decline at all. Who the hell else would be #3 given the state of Nadal?