MargaretMcAleer
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2013
- Messages
- 55,838
- Reactions
- 34,858
- Points
- 113
I still maintain I could hit better volleys with a wooden racquet with gut than my smaller head racquet I have today
You'll like this:I still maintain I could hit better volleys with a wooden racquet with gut than my smaller head racquet I have today
You'll like this:
Besides, the racquets - there an interesting sidebar about Jamie Murray's forehand about 11'45" in - about how he was #3 in Europe behind Nadal and Gasquet in the Juniors and English coaches ruined his forehand.
People were saying the same about Federer before the pandemic, when he nearly won Wimbledon over prime Djokovic. Sometimes, the walls close in faster than you think. Djokovic has been gradually declining each year since 2023. If Djokovic (at 39) can't beat Sinner and Alcaraz, what makes you think that he will suddenly get better 3 years from now and beat those guys plus 23/24-year-old Mensik/Tien/Fonseca/Jodar, not to mention people rising from the crop of 20-22 year-olds in the 2007-09 cohorts?
Eastern Europeans sure do age better, so if I look at the Oldest Living Europeans list, I'm sure to find all Eastern Europeans... oh wait, it's all full of Western Europeans:aging factor for Eastern European people and Djokovic in particular versus other players. We still need to see how Alcaraz etc. hold up in 2-3 years. Do you remember that Djokovic beat Alcaraz in Oz Open 2025. That was also prime Alcaraz. Same goes for Olympics 2024. If that is possible everything is possible. Djokovic will surely maintain himself and make a comeback.
1 | Ethel Caterham | 21 Aug 1909 | 116 |
|
2 | Lucia Sangenito | 22 Nov 1910 | 115 | |
3 | Madeleine Dellamonica | 23 July 1912 | 113 | |
4 | Merah Smith | 9 Nov 1912 | 113 | |
5 | Maria da Conceição de Brito | 31 Dec 1912 | 113 | |
6 | Marcelle Demorgny | 10 Mar 1913 | 113 | |
7 | Marie-Louise Bresson | 15 Mar 1913 | 113 | |
8 | Teresa Fernandez Casado | 29 July 1913 | 112 | |
9 | Felicidad Hernández Corredera | 11 Aug 1913 | 112 | |
10 | Hilda Luck | 19 Feb 1914 | 112 |
| 1 | Vitantonio Lovallo | 28 Mar 1914 | 112 | |
| 2 | Joaquim Varela | 1 June 1915 | 111 | |
| 3 | Jesús Redondo Bermejo | 2 June 1915 | 111 | |
| 4 | Hugh Munro Kerr | 9 Oct 1915 | 110 | |
| 5 | Iosif Rus | 28 Oct 1915 | 110 | |
| 6 | Joan Escude Farriol | 6 Jan 1916 | 110 | |
| 7 | Pedro Bernadas Mujica | 2 Aug 1916 | 109 | |
| 8 | Joao De Almeida | 21 Oct 1916 | 109 | |
| 9 | Pere Quintana | 18 Jan 1917 | 109 | |
| 10 | Odd Borlaug | 31 Mar 1917 | 109 |
people forget that Stefan was incredibly quick around the court, and had an immense positional IQ. Even after an age of the Big 3, he played a set against Boris in their final match of the Wimbledon trilogy that is in my mind the greatest exposition of serve and volley tennis. It was just the crispness of the volleys, it was the fact that the set up shot forced Boris to put the ball exactly where Edberg went. It was incredible. Mac may well be the most talented volleyer we've ever seen, but Stefan was the BESTLendl hated playing him too... and Muster.
Change it for "everyone is a loser" and we have a deal.My Dear Mrzz
I will kindly switch your Zed Tee Shirt for a Sinner is a Winner Tee shirt......let me know in advance and I will express post it to you
Love your Mrzz you always keep me honest in ways![]()
Edberg must have wrist and forehands at the Popeye level. I cant imagine trying to control a racket from a player putting that much spin on the ball with a Continental grip. I had to switch to Semi Western to handle the spin and dominate the flat ball.Most modern players ( and many older) use semi western (Nole, Rafa) or eastern forehand grips (Roger). Edberg used the old school continental grip, which could be used for both forehand and backhand. Advantage is he did not have to switch grips between sides but lots of downsides too as in limited wrist motion, very little spin, etc...But somehow he made it work.
I will slightly disagree. I think John McEnroe had a better volley. I think if Stefan would have played with a wooden racket, his results may not been as good. I think Vitas Gerulaitis was just as talented especially with the wooden racket. What made both so good was their stick volley was usually the finishing shot. Again, its debatable and you folks are bigger admires of Stefan's game than I was. I can respect everyone else opinion. My list is 1. Sampras 2. McEnroe 3. Edberg. Vitas just didnt have the numbers to make the top of the list but man that dude had a beautiful game to watch.people forget that Stefan was incredibly quick around the court, and had an immense positional IQ. Even after an age of the Big 3, he played a set against Boris in their final match of the Wimbledon trilogy that is in my mind the greatest exposition of serve and volley tennis. It was just the crispness of the volleys, it was the fact that the set up shot forced Boris to put the ball exactly where Edberg went. It was incredible. Mac may well be the most talented volleyer we've ever seen, but Stefan was the BEST
Can I stretched our friendship Everyone is a loser ( expect Moi )Change it for "everyone is a loser" and we have a deal.
Our friendship is made of rubber! It survives my sour grapes...Can I stretched our friendship Everyone is a loser ( expect Moi )
Meaning....Everyone is a loser ( except me)Our friendship is made of rubber! It survives my sour grapes...
(but I admit I did not get exactly what you meant).
I will slightly disagree. I think John McEnroe had a better volley. I think if Stefan would have played with a wooden racket, his results may not been as good. I think Vitas Gerulaitis was just as talented especially with the wooden racket. What made both so good was their stick volley was usually the finishing shot. Again, its debatable and you folks are bigger admires of Stefan's game than I was. I can respect everyone else opinion. My list is 1. Sampras 2. McEnroe 3. Edberg. Vitas just didnt have the numbers to make the top of the list but man that dude had a beautiful game to watch.
Look at McEnroe.. this is a gift from God. John sees the ball so damn early and reads the spin perfectly.
no No I didnt not miss your point.. I understand that Stefan's volley was his PLAN A and Plan B. I think Johnny Mac obviously was more talented and to me he was better situational volleyer. Stefan followed the same path to the net which to me was predictable but he got away with it. Mac was a tremendous server and his hands around the net was second to non. Again.. its your opinion I just think if you take the graphite composite material racket out of Stefan's hand and replace it with wood , the results would be dissimilar.I think you missed my point entirely. I'll say it again. I think Mac is the most talented volleyer I've ever seen. And part of the reason I say that is because he had a wooden racquet. But Stefan's volleys, for me, are the pinnacle of what aggressive volleying could be. Not only was he extremely good at volleying but he was the master of the one two. The first volley went somewhere that forced a defensive response. The next volley was terminal. He did that better than anyone I've ever seen. That doesn't mean that on a one off volley I don't think Mac had more talent. I'm saying Stefan Edberg used volleys in a way that was at once more aggressive than anyone else I have ever seen, but he won points with more facility than anyone I've ever seen. And it was a strategy that required a deep understanding of court position, the capabilities of his opponent and the athleticism and speed to get into an anticipated position to deliver a point ending volley
Here is a really old picture of my mirror racket with my love , Gaby....and a Wilander poster too.Just to bring this post back to the present in the mens final Sinner v Zverev for a minute
I also was remembering the Good Old Days, having a wooden racquet and loving my Dunlop Volleys
The post which was a Stand Out to me was,
Murat who now uses his wooden racquet as A Mirrorthat was just Gold Murat Pure Gold!
I have always been a fan of Edberg, his touch and volleys have always been a Treat, I am not dismissing Mac in any way, he has great hands.
This great stat from Sinner,
With the Wimbledon final in the books ( I did post this earlier, might have gone over looked)
Sinner maintains a streak of 85 consecutive service holds against Zverev? that is just Sic, regardless if you are a Sinner fan or not btw
Also in his SF against Novak he had 1 BP and saved it all match
In the final Zverev had 1 BP and again Sinner saved it, my tennis coach always told me it is the BPs of a match which an important key in a tennis match, how players handle important and pressure moments in a match and Jannik did both in his SF and Final
It's Edberg's kicker that gives him that pathway to the net. Possibly one of the great underrated serves.no No I didnt not miss your point.. I understand that Stefan's volley was his PLAN A and Plan B. I think Johnny Mac obviously was more talented and to me he was better situational volleyer. Stefan followed the same path to the net which to me was predictable but he got away with it. Mac was a tremendous server and his hands around the net was second to non. Again.. its your opinion I just think if you take the graphite composite material racket out of Stefan's hand and replace it with wood , the results would be dissimilar.
Thanks Mrzz Love You as alwaysMeaning....Everyone is a loser ( except me)or Moi meaning Me
Barron.. Let me take you down a rabbit hole. First I agree. Edberg's kicker was legendary and was extremely effective. Let's imagine Stefan playing against Borg and Conners who both had excellent return of serves and was geniuses from the baseline. I think they both would have broken down Stefan's ground strokes once they got the ball in play. It took legends like Mac and Lendl to deal with those two somewhat.. Lendl probably didnt face Prime Borg that much. I think the game dropped a bit when Borg left and the Johnny Mac/Jimbo was at the end of their prime by 1986. The Becker/Edberg era was probably the less talented era in the last 50 years of tennis .. maybe.. Any thoughts?It's Edberg's kicker that gives him that pathway to the net. Possibly one of the great underrated serves.
I guess we'll never truly know about how he'd have managed with wood, but he wouldn't have need to modify his own mechanics much - he's already holding his own with a more continental style grip against players using modern technology - McEnroe didn't reach those heights once the technologies moved along - so you could argue that Edberg would have been even better in the older era. I think the wooden era would have rewarded his serve and volley - it did for everyone else.
Barron.. Let me take you down a rabbit hole. First I agree. Edberg's kicker was legendary and was extremely effective. Let's imagine Stefan playing against Borg and Conners who both had excellent return of serves and was geniuses from the baseline. I think they both would have broken down Stefan's ground strokes once they got the ball in play. It took legends like Mac and Lendl to deal with those two somewhat.. Lendl probably didnt face Prime Borg that much. I think the game dropped a bit when Borg left and the Johnny Mac/Jimbo was at the end of their prime by 1986. The Becker/Edberg era was probably the less talented era in the last 50 years of tennis .. maybe.. Any thoughts?



